00:00
/
00:00

Buildings account for over 30% of global CO₂ emissions and are therefore at the center of European climate and regulatory policy. The energy-efficient renovation of buildings is no longer a voluntary measure, but is enforced directly and indirectly by EU directives, national laws and market mechanisms.
For owners, investors and companies in the building sector, this creates significant regulatory, financial and strategic action constraints.
A key regulatory driver is the Recast of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) of the European Union. This prescribes specific minimum requirements for the energy efficiency and technical equipment of buildings.
Minimum energy performance standards (MEPS):
These requirements affect a large part of the existing building stock and make renovations inevitable.
In addition to energy efficiency, the Building automation in the focus of regulation:
This often affects buildings with 1,000—1,500 m² of floor space.
The aim is to make energy consumption transparent, controllable and optimizable.
The EPBD has already been implemented in many EU countries — for example through the Building Energy Act (GEG) in Germany.
Additionally tighten rising CO₂ costs the economic situation of inefficient buildings:
For fossil fuels, this means:
Particularly relevant for owners:
In the case of inefficient buildings, most of these additional costs must be borne by yourself (e.g. as a result of the CO₂ Cost Allocation Act in Germany) — they cannot be fully passed on to tenants.
As part of EU taxonomy Companies must disclose what proportion of their:
is taxonomy compliant.
Two activities in particular are relevant for the building sector:
Both are regarded as “enabling activities” — i.e. key technologies for decarbonizing other sectors of the economy. Buildings without appropriate measures therefore lose strategic relevance for ESG-compliant investments.
Regulatory requirements are also increasingly having balance sheet and market effects:
Buildings that do not meet efficiency and automation requirements are considered to be “Brown Assets”:
Banks and institutional investors Are already pricing in these risks:
Show yourself on the market Price reductions of up to 10-20% (“Brown Discount”)
compared to taxonomy-compliant buildings. Increasing CO₂ costs further reinforce this effect and increase the risk of Stranded Assets.
The combination of Regulation, CO₂ pricing, EU taxonomy and capital market pressure makes it clear:
Energetic renovation and intelligent building automation are no optional ESG measures, but economic necessities.
For owners and investors, opts for todayswhether buildings are long-term:
remain — or become cost and risk factors.
Download the white paper now: “The role of building automation in the renovation strategy”

viboo adds a new layer of intelligence to buildings — one that learns from data, anticipates what’s coming, and keeps them efficient, comfortable, and future-ready.

Gebäudeautomation wird zur Schlüsseltechnologie im Bestand: Energie sparen, Betrieb verbessern, Sanierungen vorbereiten. Im neusten Whitepaper erfahren Sie, Sie mit vernetzter Regelung Energie- und Taxonomievorgaben erfüllen.

Building automation optimizes heating, ventilation and lighting — saves energy, reduces CO₂ emissions and increases comfort in commercial properties.

Despite using hardware, Viboo remains climate-friendly: After just around one month, the grey emissions are offset by energy savings.

Hotel Crystal St. Moritz saves around 20% of heating energy with viboo & Siemens — less CO₂ emissions, more comfort and sustainable hotel management.
Find out how viboo can make your buildings more energy efficient — contact us today!